Election for Senate Seat: Florida / Scott

There will be an election on November 5th for this seat, between following candidate(s). This is a table of the quantity of individual donors and the amounts they've contributed to the campaign(s) for this seat.

Select: PrimaryGeneralBoth
FL Donors
FL Amount
Non-FL Donors
Non-FL Amount
R Rick Scott
32%1,517
38%$1,481,535
46%2,771
29%$1,182,288
D Debbie Mucarsel-Powell
68%3,264
62%$2,419,932
54%3,212
71%$2,955,089
R Rick Scott
67%80
56%$116,942
59%109
51%$201,642
D Debbie Mucarsel-Powell
33%39
44%$90,503
41%76
49%$194,496
R Rick Scott
33%1,597
39%$1,598,477
47%2,880
31%$1,383,930
D Debbie Mucarsel-Powell
67%3,303
61%$2,510,435
53%3,288
69%$3,149,585

The following candidates are running for this seat. See below the financial summary data from their campaigns.

Contributions
Disbursements
Cash on Hand
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$7,039,967.53
$32,497,441.03
$2,082,849.58
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$31,819.91
$31,769.91
$50.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$295,557.69
$664,776.76
$116,986.33
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$30,580,459.92
$29,719,084.95
$1,691,913.82
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$1,091,124.45
$1,113,446.33
$34,126.66
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$5,455.00
$73,455.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$108,617.41
$1,391,650.16
$118,434.38
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$73,508.96
$72,613.85
$12,895.11
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$185,112.38
$2,618,212.60
$5,776.65
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$15,459.64
$25,899.64
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$16,106.90
$18,499.25
$607.65
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$12,445.00
$23,672.05
$-1,327.05

The following candidates have registered as candidates for this seat with the FEC, but have not filed reports that indicate they have raised substantial funds for the 2024 election.

Contributions
Disbursements
Cash on Hand
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$325.00
$325.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

The following polls have been published for this seat. Click a poll to see more information about it. Please take note that in any given poll there are often many undecided voters(marked in grey). The more undecided voters there are, the less definitive I would say the poll is. Also be mindful of the methodology, the sample size, the grade the pollster has with FiveThirtyEight, and the age of the poll. I say all this because in 2024, polls have become a patently unreliable source of data, but even so, they have an outsized effect on the general level of news coverage, pundit assessment, and even fundraising for any given race. That said, I still believe it is possible to read valuable data from polls, if you know what to look for. The bottom line is that polls should absolutely not be taken as gospel. They are a tool in the psephologist's toolbox.

Scott(51.1%)
Mucarsel-Powell(46.6%)
2.3%
204
186
9
Victory Insights • 538 grade: 1.3
11/4/24
Likely Voters
IVR/Text-to-Web
Sample: 400
Scott(50.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(43.0%)
7%
225
193
31
Research Co. • 538 grade: 2.4
11/4/24
Likely Voters
Online Panel
Sample: 450
Scott(48.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(45.0%)
7%
970
909
141
Morning Consult • 538 grade: 1.9
11/3/24
Likely Voters
Online Panel
Sample: 2022
Scott(53.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(45.0%)
2%
239
203
9
11/2/24
Likely Voters
Online Panel
Sample: 452
Scott(49.1%)
Mucarsel-Powell(45.2%)
Bonoan(1.5%)
Everidge(0.7%)
Nguyen(0.3%)
3.2%
294
271
9
4
1
19
Cygnal • 538 grade: 2.1
10/31/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone/Text-to-Web
Sample: 600
Scott(49.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(45.0%)
6%
536
492
65
YouGov • 538 grade: 3.0
10/30/24
Registered Voters
Online Panel
Sample: 1094
Scott(50.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(46.0%)
4%
448
412
35
10/29/24
Likely Voters
Text-to-Web
Sample: 897
Scott(50.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(46.0%)
4%
448
412
35
10/29/24
Likely Voters
Text-to-Web
Sample: 897
Scott(55.2%)
Mucarsel-Powell(44.8%)
220
179
ActiVote • 538 grade: Not Rated
10/28/24
Likely Voters
App Panel
Sample: 400
Scott(48.8%)
Mucarsel-Powell(45.6%)
5.6%
598
559
68
St. Pete Polls • 538 grade: 2.4
10/28/24
Likely Voters
IVR/Text
Sample: 1227
Scott(51.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(46.0%)
3%
313
282
18
Cherry Communications • 538 grade: 1.0
10/25/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone
Sample: 614
Scott(52.8%)
Mucarsel-Powell(47.2%)
454
405
Emerson College • 538 grade: 2.9
10/23/24
Likely Voters
IVR/Online Panel/Text-to-Web
Sample: 860
Scott(45.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(42.0%)
Bonoan(1.0%)
12%
573
535
12
153
Redfield & Wilton Strategies • 538 grade: 1.8
10/21/24
Likely Voters
Online Panel
Sample: 1275
Scott(51.9%)
Mucarsel-Powell(48.1%)
207
192
ActiVote • 538 grade: Not Rated
10/21/24
Likely Voters
App Panel
Sample: 400
Scott(49.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(46.0%)
5%
478
449
48
10/21/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone
Sample: 977
Scott(52.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(44.0%)
4%
409
346
31
RMG Research • 538 grade: 2.3
10/18/24
Likely Voters
Online Panel
Sample: 788
Scott(45.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(42.0%)
Bonoan(2.0%)
11%
454
423
20
110
Redfield & Wilton Strategies • 538 grade: 1.8
10/16/24
Likely Voters
Online Panel
Sample: 1009
Scott(48.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(41.0%)
11%
300
256
68
10/13/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone
Sample: 625
Scott(50.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(48.0%)
2%
705
676
28
Marist College • 538 grade: 2.9
10/10/24
Registered Voters
Live Phone/Online Panel/Text-to-Web
Sample: 1410
Scott(50.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(48.0%)
2%
705
676
28
Marist College • 538 grade: 2.9
10/10/24
Registered Voters
Live Phone/Online Panel/Text-to-Web
Sample: 1410
Scott(48.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(39.0%)
13%
298
242
80
10/10/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone
Sample: 622
Scott(49.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(40.0%)
11%
304
248
68
10/10/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone
Sample: 622
Scott(44.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(41.0%)
Bonoan(1.0%)
14%
1296
1207
29
412
Redfield & Wilton Strategies • 538 grade: 1.8
10/7/24
Likely Voters
Online Panel
Sample: 2946
Scott(50.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(44.0%)
6%
387
340
46
RMG Research • 538 grade: 2.3
10/3/24
Likely Voters
Online Panel
Sample: 774
Scott(51.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(44.0%)
5%
612
528
60
McLaughlin & Associates • 538 grade: 0.5
10/2/24
Likely Voters
Sample: 1200
Scott(44.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(43.0%)
Bonoan(2.0%)
11%
355
347
16
88
Public Policy Polling • 538 grade: 1.4
9/30/24
Registered Voters
IVR/Text
Sample: 808
Scott(47.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(44.0%)
9%
379
355
72
Public Policy Polling • 538 grade: 1.4
9/30/24
Registered Voters
IVR/Text
Sample: 808
Scott(44.6%)
Mucarsel-Powell(43.8%)
11.6%
267
262
69
Victory Insights • 538 grade: 1.3
9/30/24
Likely Voters
IVR/Text-to-Web
Sample: 600
Scott(46.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(44.0%)
10%
276
264
60
The Bullfinch Group • 538 grade: Not Rated
9/24/24
Registered Voters
Online Panel
Sample: 600
Scott(45.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(41.0%)
Bonoan(1.0%)
13%
720
656
16
208
Redfield & Wilton Strategies • 538 grade: 1.8
9/23/24
Likely Voters
Online Panel
Sample: 1602
Scott(53.9%)
Mucarsel-Powell(46.1%)
215
184
ActiVote • 538 grade: Not Rated
9/22/24
Likely Voters
App Panel
Sample: 400
Scott(46.38%)
Mucarsel-Powell(42.01%)
11.61%
1367
1238
342
Morning Consult • 538 grade: 1.9
9/19/24
Likely Voters
Online Panel
Sample: 2948
Scott(44.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(41.0%)
Bonoan(1.0%)
14%
644
600
14
205
Redfield & Wilton Strategies • 538 grade: 1.8
9/10/24
Likely Voters
Online Panel
Sample: 1465
Scott(46.89%)
Mucarsel-Powell(41.55%)
11.56%
1492
1322
367
Morning Consult • 538 grade: 1.9
9/9/24
Likely Voters
Online Panel
Sample: 3182
Scott(45.8%)
Mucarsel-Powell(44.8%)
9.40000000000001%
373
365
76
Emerson College • 538 grade: 2.9
9/6/24
Likely Voters
Online Panel/Text-to-Web
Sample: 815
Scott(43.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(40.0%)
Bonoan(1.0%)
16%
365
340
8
136
Redfield & Wilton Strategies • 538 grade: 1.8
8/30/24
Likely Voters
Online Panel
Sample: 850
Scott(51.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(44.0%)
5%
306
264
30
Cherry Communications • 538 grade: 1.0
8/30/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone
Sample: 600
Scott(47.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(41.0%)
12%
464
405
118
Targoz Market Research • 538 grade: 1.8
8/29/24
Likely Voters
Online Panel
Sample: 988
Scott(49.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(43.0%)
8%
484
424
79
Targoz Market Research • 538 grade: 1.8
8/29/24
Likely Voters
Online Panel
Sample: 988
Scott(46.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(43.0%)
Bonoan(2.0%)
9%
385
359
16
75
Public Policy Polling • 538 grade: 1.4
8/27/24
Registered Voters
IVR/Text-to-Web
Sample: 837
Scott(48.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(45.0%)
7%
401
376
58
Public Policy Polling • 538 grade: 1.4
8/27/24
Registered Voters
IVR/Text-to-Web
Sample: 837
Scott(47.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(43.0%)
10%
488
447
104
8/14/24
Likely Voters
IVR/Online Panel/Text-to-Web
Sample: 1040
Scott(47.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(43.0%)
10%
488
447
104
8/14/24
Likely Voters
IVR/Online Panel/Text-to-Web
Sample: 1040
Scott(52.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(42.0%)
6%
416
336
48
McLaughlin & Associates • 538 grade: 0.5
8/13/24
Likely Voters
Sample: 800
Scott(47.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(43.0%)
10%
363
332
77
7/30/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone/Text-to-Web
Sample: 774
Scott(44.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(40.0%)
16%
339
308
123
6/12/24
Likely Voters
IVR/Online Panel
Sample: 771
Scott(45.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(43.0%)
12%
346
331
92
6/12/24
Likely Voters
IVR/Online Panel
Sample: 771
Scott(46.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(33.0%)
21%
483
346
220
The Tyson Group • 538 grade: 1.1
6/11/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone/Text-to-Web
Sample: 1050
Scott(45.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(37.0%)
18%
523
430
209
YouGov • 538 grade: 3.0
5/19/24
Likely Voters
Online Panel
Sample: 1163
Scott(46.9%)
Mucarsel-Powell(35.6%)
17.5%
618
469
230
Big Data Poll • 538 grade: 1.1
5/14/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone/Online Panel/Text-to-Web/Text
Sample: 1318
Scott(48.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(36.5%)
15.5%
632
481
204
Big Data Poll • 538 grade: 1.1
5/14/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone/Online Panel/Text-to-Web/Text
Sample: 1318
Scott(54.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(39.0%)
7%
328
237
42
Cherry Communications • 538 grade: 1.0
5/10/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone
Sample: 609
Scott(51.5%)
Mucarsel-Powell(35.1%)
13.4%
419
286
109
4/18/24
Likely Voters
IVR/Text-to-Web
Sample: 815
Scott(52.9%)
Mucarsel-Powell(35.7%)
11.4%
431
290
92
4/18/24
Likely Voters
IVR/Text-to-Web
Sample: 815
Scott(36.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(26.0%)
38%
365
263
385
Ipsos • 538 grade: 2.8
4/14/24
Probability Panel
Sample: 1014
Scott(45.4%)
Mucarsel-Powell(38.1%)
16.5%
453
381
165
Emerson College • 538 grade: 2.9
4/11/24
Registered Voters
IVR/Online Panel/Text-to-Web
Sample: 1000
Scott(44.0%)
Mucarsel-Powell(41.0%)
15%
347
323
118
Public Policy Polling • 538 grade: 1.4
3/5/24
Voters
IVR/Text
Sample: 790
Scott(45.0%)
Ehr(41.0%)
14%
584
532
181
Change Research • 538 grade: 1.4
7/25/23
Likely Voters
Text-to-Web/Online Ad
Sample: 1298