Election for Senate Seat: Nebraska / Fischer

There will be an election on November 5th for this seat, between following candidate(s). This is a table of the quantity of individual donors and the amounts they've contributed to the campaign(s) for this seat.

Select: PrimaryGeneralBoth
NE Donors
NE Amount
Non-NE Donors
Non-NE Amount
R Deb Fischer
80%371
79%$270,448
53%704
58%$896,735
I Dan Osborn
20%90
21%$71,612
47%612
42%$654,715
R Deb Fischer
57%26
54%$28,545
45%93
56%$158,252
I Dan Osborn
43%20
46%$24,240
55%113
44%$125,259
R Deb Fischer
78%397
76%$298,993
52%797
57%$1,054,987
I Dan Osborn
22%110
24%$95,852
48%725
43%$779,974

The following candidates are running for this seat. See below the financial summary data from their campaigns.

Contributions
Disbursements
Cash on Hand
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$2,946,129.20
$4,170,185.94
$1,224,984.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$4,394,884.66
$6,678,159.73
$582,814.19
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$182,419.65
$205,233.70
$41,095.30
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$56,973.54
$56,973.54
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$7,955,580.00
$6,827,048.69
$1,135,561.75

The following candidates have registered as candidates for this seat with the FEC, but have not filed reports that indicate they have raised substantial funds for the 2024 election.

Contributions
Disbursements
Cash on Hand
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

The following polls have been published for this seat. Click a poll to see more information about it. Please take note that in any given poll there are often many undecided voters(marked in grey). The more undecided voters there are, the less definitive I would say the poll is. Also be mindful of the methodology, the sample size, the grade the pollster has with FiveThirtyEight, and the age of the poll. I say all this because in 2024, polls have become a patently unreliable source of data, but even so, they have an outsized effect on the general level of news coverage, pundit assessment, and even fundraising for any given race. That said, I still believe it is possible to read valuable data from polls, if you know what to look for. The bottom line is that polls should absolutely not be taken as gospel. They are a tool in the psephologist's toolbox.

Fischer(51.4%)
Osborn(43.7%)
4.9%
310
264
29
Torchlight Strategies • 538 grade: Not Rated
11/1/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone/Text-to-Web
Sample: 605
Osborn(47.0%)
Fischer(47.0%)
6%
282
282
36
Change Research • 538 grade: 1.4
10/31/24
Likely Voters
Text-to-Web/Online Ad
Sample: 600
Fischer(50.0%)
Osborn(43.0%)
7%
601
516
84
YouGov • 538 grade: 3.0
10/30/24
Likely Voters
Online Panel/Text-to-Web
Sample: 1202
Osborn(47.0%)
Fischer(46.0%)
7%
561
549
83
10/28/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone
Sample: 1194
Ricketts(56.0%)
Love(37.0%)
7%
668
441
83
10/28/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone
Sample: 1194
Fischer(48.0%)
Osborn(46.0%)
6%
573
549
71
10/28/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone
Sample: 1194
Ricketts(56.0%)
Love(38.0%)
6%
668
453
71
10/28/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone
Sample: 1194
Osborn(48.0%)
Fischer(46.0%)
6%
391
374
48
Change Research • 538 grade: 1.4
10/23/24
Likely Voters
Text-to-Web/Online Ad
Sample: 815
Fischer(51.0%)
Osborn(44.0%)
5%
318
275
31
Torchlight Strategies • 538 grade: Not Rated
10/17/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone/Text-to-Web
Sample: 625
Osborn(50.0%)
Fischer(44.0%)
6%
281
247
33
SurveyUSA • 538 grade: 2.8
10/15/24
Likely Voters
Sample: 563
Ricketts(53.0%)
Love(37.0%)
10%
298
208
56
SurveyUSA • 538 grade: 2.8
10/15/24
Likely Voters
Sample: 563
Fischer(48.0%)
Osborn(42.0%)
10%
288
252
60
Torchlight Strategies • 538 grade: Not Rated
10/11/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone/Text-to-Web
Sample: 600
Osborn(46.0%)
Fischer(43.0%)
11%
411
384
98
Change Research • 538 grade: 1.4
10/11/24
Likely Voters
Text-to-Web/Online Ad
Sample: 895
Osborn(48.0%)
Fischer(46.0%)
6%
288
276
36
Impact Research • 538 grade: 1.5
10/8/24
Likely Voters
Sample: 600
Osborn(47.0%)
Fischer(42.0%)
11%
188
168
44
The Bullfinch Group • 538 grade: Not Rated
10/2/24
Likely Voters
Online Panel
Sample: 400
Osborn(45.0%)
Fischer(44.0%)
11%
251
245
61
SurveyUSA • 538 grade: 2.8
9/25/24
Likely Voters
IVR/Online Panel/Text-to-Web
Sample: 558
Ricketts(53.0%)
Love(35.0%)
12%
295
195
66
SurveyUSA • 538 grade: 2.8
9/25/24
Likely Voters
IVR/Online Panel/Text-to-Web
Sample: 558
Fischer(49.0%)
Osborn(36.0%)
15%
294
216
90
Global Strategy Group • 538 grade: 1.8
9/24/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone/Text-to-Web
Sample: 600
Fischer(43.0%)
Osborn(42.0%)
15%
258
252
90
Global Strategy Group • 538 grade: 1.8
9/20/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone/Text-to-Web
Sample: 600
Fischer(39.0%)
Osborn(38.0%)
23%
504
491
297
SurveyUSA • 538 grade: 2.8
9/1/24
Registered Voters
IVR/Online Panel/Text-to-Web
Sample: 1293
Ricketts(50.0%)
Love(33.0%)
17%
646
426
219
SurveyUSA • 538 grade: 2.8
9/1/24
Registered Voters
IVR/Online Panel/Text-to-Web
Sample: 1293
Fischer(43.0%)
Osborn(41.0%)
16%
215
205
80
YouGov • 538 grade: 3.0
8/19/24
Registered Voters
Online Panel
Sample: 500
Osborn(42.0%)
Fischer(42.0%)
16%
210
210
80
7/23/24
Registered Voters
Live Phone
Sample: 500
Eddy(9.0%)
Fischer(50.0%)
Osborn(24.0%)
17%
62
349
167
118
Torchlight Strategies • 538 grade: Not Rated
7/19/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone/Text-to-Web
Sample: 698
Fischer(37.0%)
Osborn(33.0%)
30%
272
243
221
Public Policy Polling • 538 grade: 1.4
5/6/24
Voters
IVR/Text
Sample: 737
Osborn(40.0%)
Fischer(38.0%)
22%
419
398
230
Change Research • 538 grade: 1.4
12/6/23
Likely Voters
Text-to-Web/Online Ad
Sample: 1048