Election for Senate Seat: Wisconsin / Baldwin

The following candidates are running for this seat. See below the financial summary data from their campaigns.

Contributions
Disbursements
Cash on Hand
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$15,447,051.07
$9,790,094.02
$10,251,350.43
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$11,047.57
$10,948.64
$114.93
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$33,361.73
$33,712.56
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$1,030,436.98
$3,720,299.58
$5,349,511.78
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$21,447.78
$16,855.99
$4,591.79

The following candidates have registered as candidates for this seat with the FEC, but have not filed reports that indicate they have raised substantial funds for the 2024 election.

Contributions
Disbursements
Cash on Hand
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ballotpedia Wikipedia Google News
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

The following polls have been published for this seat. Click a poll to see more information about it. Please take note that in any given poll there are often many undecided voters(marked in grey). The more undecided voters there are, the less definitive I would say the poll is. Also be mindful of the methodology, the sample size, the grade the pollster has with FiveThirtyEight, and the age of the poll. I say all this because in 2024, polls have become a patently unreliable source of data, but even so, they have an outsized effect on the general level of news coverage, pundit assessment, and even fundraising for any given race. That said, I still believe it is possible to read valuable data from polls, if you know what to look for. The bottom line is that polls should absolutely not be taken as gospel. They are a tool in the psephologist's toolbox.

Baldwin(49.0%)
Hovde(40.0%)
11%
300
245
67
5/13/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone
Sample: 614
Baldwin(49.0%)
Hovde(42.0%)
9%
300
257
55
5/13/24
Likely Voters
Live Phone
Sample: 614
Baldwin(54.0%)
Hovde(42.0%)
4%
786
611
58
Quinnipiac University • 538 grade: 2.8
5/8/24
Registered Voters
Live Phone
Sample: 1457
Baldwin(46.3%)
Hovde(42.8%)
10.9%
462
428
109
Emerson College • 538 grade: 2.9
4/30/24
Registered Voters
IVR/Online Panel/Text-to-Web
Sample: 1000
Baldwin(48.0%)
Hovde(41.0%)
11%
597
510
136
YouGov • 538 grade: 2.9
4/29/24
Registered Voters
Online Panel
Sample: 1245
Baldwin(52.0%)
Hovde(47.0%)
1%
367
332
7
4/17/24
Likely Voters
Probability Panel
Sample: 707
Hovde(50.0%)
Baldwin(50.0%)
353
353
4/17/24
Likely Voters
Probability Panel
Sample: 707
Baldwin(44.8%)
Hovde(41.7%)
13.5%
447
417
135
Emerson College • 538 grade: 2.9
3/21/24
Registered Voters
IVR/Online Panel/Email
Sample: 1000
Baldwin(46.2%)
Hovde(38.5%)
15.3%
462
385
152
Emerson College • 538 grade: 2.9
2/27/24
Registered Voters
IVR/Online Panel/Text-to-Web/Email
Sample: 1000
Baldwin(47.0%)
Gallagher(46.0%)
7%
235
230
35
Fabrizio, Lee & Associates • 538 grade: 1.7
6/2/23
Likely Voters
Live Phone/Text-to-Web
Sample: 500